<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Economics on Cloud/AI Transformation &amp; Enterprise Strategy</title><link>https://thomasblood.com/tags/economics/</link><description>Recent content in Economics on Cloud/AI Transformation &amp; Enterprise Strategy</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thomasblood.com/tags/economics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Default is Contribution — Part 3: The Question of Time</title><link>https://thomasblood.com/blog/2026-03-12-the-default-is-contribution-part-3-the-question-of-time/</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://thomasblood.com/blog/2026-03-12-the-default-is-contribution-part-3-the-question-of-time/</guid><description>This is Part 3 of a three-part series. Part 1: The Forgotten Book established that moral responsibility is the foundation, not the add-on. Part 2: The Reset explored what changes when contribution becomes architecture.
There is a prediction that haunts the AI debate, though most people making the debate have never read it.
In 1930, John Maynard Keynes published a short essay called Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. In it, he made a startling claim: within a hundred years — by 2030 — the economic problem would be solved.</description></item><item><title>The Default is Contribution — Part 2: The Reset</title><link>https://thomasblood.com/blog/2026-03-08-the-default-is-contribution-part-2-the-reset/</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://thomasblood.com/blog/2026-03-08-the-default-is-contribution-part-2-the-reset/</guid><description>This is Part 2 of a three-part series. Part 1: The Forgotten Book established that moral responsibility is the foundation, not the add-on. Part 3: The Question of Time asks what we do with the hours machines give back.
In Part 1, I argued that &amp;ldquo;Tech for Good&amp;rdquo; is a philosophical error — that Adam Smith&amp;rsquo;s Theory of Moral Sentiments established contribution as the default, not a department. The impartial spectator cannot be outsourced.</description></item><item><title>The Default is Contribution — Part 1: The Forgotten Book</title><link>https://thomasblood.com/blog/2026-03-06-the-default-is-contribution-part-1-the-forgotten-book/</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://thomasblood.com/blog/2026-03-06-the-default-is-contribution-part-1-the-forgotten-book/</guid><description>This is Part 1 of a three-part series. Part 2: The Reset explores what changes when contribution becomes architecture. Part 3: The Question of Time asks what we do with the hours machines give back.
There is a phrase that has always bothered me: &amp;ldquo;Tech for Good.&amp;rdquo;
It sounds noble. It appears on conference agendas and in corporate mission statements, usually next to a photograph of someone holding a tablet in a field.</description></item></channel></rss>