This is Part 3 of a three-part series. Part 1: The Forgotten Book established that moral responsibility is the foundation, not the add-on. Part 2: The Reset explored what changes when contribution becomes architecture.
There is a prediction that haunts the AI debate, though most people making the debate have never read it.
In 1930, John Maynard Keynes published a short essay called Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren. In it, he made a startling claim: within a hundred years — by 2030 — the economic problem would be solved.
This is Part 2 of a three-part series. Part 1: The Forgotten Book established that moral responsibility is the foundation, not the add-on. Part 3: The Question of Time asks what we do with the hours machines give back.
In Part 1, I argued that “Tech for Good” is a philosophical error — that Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments established contribution as the default, not a department. The impartial spectator cannot be outsourced.
This is Part 1 of a three-part series. Part 2: The Reset explores what changes when contribution becomes architecture. Part 3: The Question of Time asks what we do with the hours machines give back.
There is a phrase that has always bothered me: “Tech for Good.”
It sounds noble. It appears on conference agendas and in corporate mission statements, usually next to a photograph of someone holding a tablet in a field.
